5 Things To Know About Trump’s Order Banning Political Debanking
Authored by Kevin Stocklin via The Epoch Times,
President Donald Trump’s executive order banning politicized debanking is intended to reverse what some analysts say is a trend of banks and payment services refusing service to people and companies for political, religious, or ideological reasons.
Advocates against political debanking cite cases of Christians and conservatives who they say have been victims of this process. This includes allegations by Christian organizations including Tennessee-based nonprofit Indigenous Advance Ministries, as well as Sam Brownback, the chairman of the National Committee for Religious Freedom (NCRF), and the president himself.
Speaking to bank executives at the World Economic Forum in January, Trump said, “I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives, because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank, and that included a place called Bank of America.”
Many conservative groups expressed support for this executive order.
“Everyone needs access to basic financial services,” Brian Knight, senior counsel at the Alliance Defending Freedom, a leading advocate against ideological debanking, told The Epoch Times.
“No American should have to worry that they could lose their bank account or have a payment declined because of their religious or political beliefs.”
Banks have denied that they have taken part in political debanking.
“We don’t close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed,” Patricia Wexler, a spokesperson for JPMorgan Chase, told The Epoch Times in a statement.
“We commend the White House for addressing this issue and look forward to working with them to get this right.”
A Bank of America spokesperson told The Epoch Times in January: “We serve more than 70 million clients and we welcome conservatives. We are required to follow extensive government rules and regulations that sometimes result in decisions to exit client relationships. We never close accounts for political reasons and don’t have a political litmus test.”
The Southern Poverty Law Center, a left-wing advocacy group, criticized efforts by groups including Alliance Defending Freedom, calling them “an ongoing crusade to force private businesses to adhere to conservative Christian theology, in part by spreading the false narrative that private sector banks have been dropping conservative religious clients since the Obama administration.”
Trump’s executive order seeks to reorient federal regulators and law enforcement away from practices that may have supported political debanking and toward actions that will actively oppose it.
Here are five key takeaways from the order.
1. Regulators Drop ‘Reputational Risk’
The order directs federal regulators to stop using criteria such as “reputational risk,” which some banks say have been used to pressure them to cancel customers whose political or religious views government officials don’t like.
Some concerned shareholders say that banks that consider political views in deciding who they will serve also creates risks. One case in point, says Jerry Bowyer, CEO of Bowyer Research and an advocate for shareholders and customers against political debanking, is Trump’s allegation that several banks closed his accounts following the Jan. 6, 2021, riots at the Capitol.
“Just think about that—you debanked someone who might be the President of the United States,” Bowyer told The Epoch Times. “That doesn’t sound like risk management to me; that sounds like courting risk.”
“Turns out that it was,” he said.
Bank regulators have already taken steps to remove “reputational risk” from their criteria. In June, the Federal Reserve announced that reputational risk will no longer be a component of its bank supervision process, and said it was working with other regulatory agencies to assist them in also dropping this criterion.
2. Investigations of Unlawful Debanking to Commence
The executive order requires federal banking regulators to investigate complaints of political debanking and pass any cases on to the U.S. attorney general’s office. Penalties for violations could include fines and consent decrees, as well as reinstating any customers who were unlawfully cancelled.
This could include not only persons who have been refused service for ideological reasons but also companies.
Operation Choke Point, which was enacted under the Obama administration, was a case in which regulators allegedly pressured banks to refuse service to industries like gun retailers and payday lenders, treating them as high-risk entities.
A more recent version of this was Citibank’s policy, which started in 2018 but ended in June of this year, to refuse banking services to gun stores that sold to customers under the age of 21, which effectively prohibited business with much of the industry.
3. Financial Privacy Also a Focus
Trump’s executive order also urges a federal investigation into alleged warrantless data mining of customers’ accounts by Bank of America (BOA) to hand over information to law enforcement regarding customers who traveled to Washington D.C., shopped at sporting goods stores that sold guns like Bass Pro Shops or Cabela’s, or expressed conservative political views during the 2021 Capitol breach.
In May 2023, U.S. House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) issued a letter to BOA CEO Brian Moynihan that stated an FBI whistleblower charged that the bank “provided the FBI—voluntarily and without any legal process—with a list of individuals who had made transactions in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area with a BoA credit or debit card between January 5 and January 7, 2021,” and highlighted customers who bought firearms with a BOA credit card.
4. SBA to Reinstate Religious Organizations
Trump’s executive order also instructs the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) to reinstate clients who have been denied loans or other services for political reasons.
Previously, the SBA had prohibited any group that was “principally engaged in teaching, instructing, counseling, or indoctrinating religion” from applying for Economic Injury Disaster Loans.
The SBA ended this policy in July, in compliance with a 2016 Supreme Court decision in the case Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer, which stated that excluding religious organizations from government programs was a violation of the First Amendment.
5. State ‘Fair Access’ Laws
Several states have recently passed “fair access” banking laws that prohibit denying financial services by banks, insurance companies, and other financial institutions on political or religious grounds. Florida enacted such a law in 2023, and Tennessee did so in 2024.
Similar laws have been introduced in state legislatures in Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, and South Dakota, according to a legal analysis by law firm Latham & Watkins.
The firm stated that critics of laws against political debanking “see such initiatives as an attack on environmental, social, and corporate-governance (ESG) policies in the financial system.”
Tyler Durden
Fri, 08/08/2025 – 19:15
